6402.99.90.95 - Other
Details
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Unit of Quantity | prs. |
| General Rate of Duty | 20% |
| Special Rate of Duty | Free (AU,BH,CL,CO,D,IL,JO,KR,MA,OM,P,PA,PE,R,S,SG)
AU
๐ฆ๐บ
BH
๐ง๐ญ
CL
๐จ๐ฑ
CO
๐จ๐ด
D
๐ฆ๐ด
๐ง๐ฏ
๐ง๐ผ
๐ง๐ซ
๐จ๐ป
๐จ๐ซ
๐น๐ฉ
๐ฐ๐ฒ
๐จ๐ฎ
๐จ๐ฉ
๐ฉ๐ฏ
๐ธ๐ฟ
๐ช๐น
๐ฌ๐ฆ
๐ฌ๐ฒ
๐ฌ๐ญ
๐ฌ๐ณ
๐ฌ๐ผ
๐ฐ๐ช
๐ฑ๐ธ
๐ฑ๐ท
๐ฒ๐ฌ
๐ฒ๐ผ
๐ฒ๐ฑ
๐ฒ๐บ
๐ฒ๐ฟ
๐ณ๐ฆ
๐ณ๐ช
๐ณ๐ฌ
๐จ๐ฌ
๐ท๐ผ
๐ธ๐ณ
๐ธ๐ฑ
๐ฟ๐ฆ
๐ธ๐น
๐น๐ฟ
๐น๐ฌ
๐บ๐ฌ
๐ฟ๐ฒ
IL
๐ฎ๐ฑ
JO
๐ฏ๐ด
KR
๐ฐ๐ท
MA
๐ฒ๐ฆ
OM
๐ด๐ฒ
P
๐จ๐ท
๐ฉ๐ด
๐ธ๐ป
๐ฌ๐น
๐ญ๐ณ
๐ณ๐ฎ
PA
๐ต๐ฆ
PE
๐ต๐ช
R
๐ง๐ง
๐ง๐ฟ
๐จ๐ผ
๐ฌ๐พ
๐ญ๐น
๐ฏ๐ฒ
๐ฑ๐จ
๐น๐น
S
๐จ๐ฆ
๐ฒ๐ฝ
SG
๐ธ๐ฌ
|
| Column 2 Rate of Duty | 35% |
| Quota Quantity | N/A |
| Additional Duties | N/A |
Overview
This HTS category, 6402.99.90.95, covers "Other" footwear with outer soles and uppers of rubber or plastics, where the footwear is not specifically classified under more detailed subheadings. This broad designation applies to footwear that doesn't fit into specific gendered categories or other specialized types within the broader "other footwear" classifications. It represents a residual category for items not captured by more precise definitions.
Distinguishing this category from its siblings, 6402.99.90.35 (For men) and 6402.99.90.65 (For women), is crucial. Those siblings are reserved for footwear clearly designated or marketed for male or female wearers, respectively, based on size, style, or design. Category 6402.99.90.95 is for footwear that is either unisex, designed for children, or lacks distinct gender-specific characteristics that would place it in the sibling categories. The primary focus remains on the materials of the outer sole and upper (rubber or plastic) and the fact that it is "other" footwear not otherwise specified.
As this node is a leaf node within the HTS database, there are no further subcategories. Therefore, classification into 6402.99.90.95 hinges on the exclusion from more specific categories. Importers and exporters should thoroughly review the definitions of preceding subheadings within chapter 64 to ensure that the footwear in question truly falls into this "other, other, other" designation, considering factors such as intended use, overall construction, and absence of specific design elements tied to gender.